When Does The Prosecutor Generally Offer A Plea Deal In A Criminal Case?

Last updated on February 12, 2025

We Only Handle Cases on Long Island, New York

A plea bargain offer can be made at any stage of a criminal case. However, most prosecutors are not fully familiar with the case in the early stages, so offers are typically made after some time has passed. In straightforward cases, it usually takes only a short period for a prosecutor to review the case and decide on an offer. Having a well-regarded criminal defense attorney can lead to more favorable offers. Prosecutors recognize that cases defended by reputable attorneys are more challenging, which often results in better offers as the trial approaches.

There is a common misconception that prosecutors always make three offers. While the number three is often mentioned, there is no rule requiring it. The number of offers can vary; sometimes there is only one, sometimes multiple, and occasionally none at all. Jason Bassett, an experienced Suffolk County criminal defense lawyer with a reputation for not being afraid to take a case to trial, gives you the best chance of getting the best possible plea offer. 

If you’re in need of skilled legal representation and guidance, the Law Offices of Jason Bassett, P.C. is here for you. Contact us today at (631) 259-6060 to discuss your case and let us work together to protect your rights and achieve the best possible outcome for your situation.

Why Do Prosecutors Offer Plea Deals?

Plea deals are a common strategy used by prosecutors in New York’s criminal justice system, primarily to manage heavy caseloads effectively. Negotiating plea bargains allows prosecutors to resolve cases more quickly than if they proceeded to trial, helping alleviate the pressure on a legal system burdened by a high volume of cases. This approach not only speeds up the process but also conserves resources for both the courts and legal counsel involved.

Furthermore, plea deals allow prosecutors to secure convictions more predictably. The inherent uncertainties of a trial, where outcomes can be uncertain regardless of the evidence, often lead prosecutors to choose plea bargains. This method guarantees a conviction and some level of punishment, which may be more lenient than potential trial outcomes but ensures that justice is served to some extent.

For defendants, accepting a plea offer provides a clearer, often more favorable outcome. It reduces the risk of facing a harsher penalty if the trial does not go in their favor. Defendants might choose a plea deal to secure a lighter sentence or a lesser charge, thus avoiding the unpredictability of a trial and potentially severe consequences. This controlled resolution is particularly valuable for those seeking to minimize the impact of the legal proceedings on their lives.

What Factors Do You Consider In Determining Whether To Accept a Plea Offer Or Not?

Deciding whether to accept a plea offer is a crucial decision that involves several important considerations. The primary factor is the strength of the prosecution’s evidence and the potential for conviction if the case goes to trial. A thorough assessment of this evidence can help determine whether entering a plea would be more favorable than facing the uncertainties of trial.

Another significant consideration is the client’s criminal history. Prior convictions can negatively affect a defendant’s case, especially if they choose to testify, as these may be brought up during the trial. Additionally, certain previous offenses might lead to harsher penalties if the defendant is convicted again.

Risk tolerance also plays an essential role in this decision. Each client’s situation and attitude toward risk can vary. Some may prefer the certainty of a plea bargain, which could reduce their sentence compared to the uncertainty of a more severe penalty at trial. On the other hand, others may choose to challenge the prosecution’s case in court if they believe it benefits their situation. Carefully weighing these factors helps in making an informed decision about whether to accept a plea offer.

How Long Do You Have To Accept A Plea Deal?

Plea bargains are an integral part of the criminal justice system, yet individuals who are unfamiliar with them often struggle to understand how they work. A criminal defense lawyer can provide insight into the strengths and weaknesses of a case, along with the advantages and disadvantages of accepting a plea deal. However, the timing for making such decisions can be unpredictable.

Typically, a person facing criminal charges has the opportunity to consider and potentially accept a plea deal up until the arraignment. If the defendant chooses to decline the plea offer at that time, they enter a plea of not guilty, which results in the withdrawal of the initial offer, and the case is scheduled for trial.

Most plea offers come with an established expiration date, typically set within a few months of the offer’s issuance. Once the original plea offer expires, the prosecutor can choose to either extend it or present a new plea deal, potentially with less favorable terms.

When it comes to the crucial decision of accepting a plea deal, timing is essential. Understanding your rights and weighing the implications of such an agreement requires legal guidance. A Suffolk County criminal defense lawyer can provide the clarity and support you need. With years of experience, Jason Bassett can equip you with the information necessary to make an informed decision that serves your best interests. Contact the Law Offices of Jason Bassett, P.C. today to schedule a consultation.

How Common Is It For Criminal Cases To Go All The Way To Trial In New York?

In New York, it is relatively uncommon for criminal cases to proceed to a full trial. Most cases are resolved through plea agreements rather than going to trial. This trend is heavily influenced by the “Trial Penalty,” a concept where defendants face much harsher penalties after trial compared to what might be offered in a plea deal. The fear of severe outcomes discourages many from exercising their right to a trial, pushing them to accept plea bargains instead.

This situation is often exacerbated by attorneys who seldom take cases to trial, either due to lack of experience or skill in the courtroom. Prosecutors recognize these attorneys and are likely to offer less favorable deals, knowing that the case is unlikely to go to trial. Conversely, attorneys with a strong trial reputation may secure better plea bargains for their clients, as prosecutors anticipate a challenging trial and a potential acquittal.

The strategic decisions made by both defense attorneys and prosecutors play a crucial role in determining whether a criminal case in New York will end in a plea or go to trial. Most accused individuals, wary of the risks of harsher penalties after a trial, opt for plea deals, making actual trials a less common outcome in the state’s criminal justice system.

Will Going To Trial Put Me At Risk Of Facing A Harsher Sentence Than If I Took The Plea?

Deciding to go to trial rather than accepting a plea bargain can increase the risk of a harsher sentence. A plea bargain typically offers a lighter sentence than the maximum penalty that might result from a trial. This is a strategic offer from the prosecution to avoid the uncertainties of a trial. However, the decision to accept a plea or proceed to trial should not be made lightly. It is essential to have the case thoroughly reviewed by an experienced criminal defense attorney. This review will help assess the strength of the prosecution’s case and provide you with the necessary information to make an informed decision about how to proceed with your defense.

What Should I Expect Throughout The Trial Process In My Criminal Case In New York?

The trial process begins with jury selection. At the federal level, the judge is responsible for questioning all potential jurors. In state courts, both the prosecutor and the defense attorney can directly interrogate potential jurors through a procedure known as “voir dire.” Following the questioning phase, each party has the opportunity to challenge potential jurors “for cause” if a juror shows bias or an inability to remain fair and impartial. Additionally, each side is also given a certain number of “peremptory challenges,” allowing them to dismiss a juror without providing a reason, except exclusions based on race or gender are prohibited.

Once the jury is selected and sworn in, the judge will provide preliminary legal instructions. The trial will then proceed to the opening statements, where both the prosecution and the defense outline their expected evidence and outcomes. At both the state and federal levels, the prosecution presents first. While the defense is allowed to reserve its opening statement until the close of the prosecution’s case, this right is rarely exercised. It is commonly considered important for the jury to hear the defense’s version of events as early as possible. 

Following the opening statements, the prosecution begins presenting its case with witness testimonies and the introduction of evidence. Once the prosecution calls a witness to the stand, the prosecutor questions them (direct examination), and then the defense attorney has the opportunity to question the witness (cross-examination). Throughout the trial, attorneys may frequently challenge the admissibility of evidence or the appropriateness of the opposition’s questions through objections to the court.

After the prosecution rests its case, the defense decides whether to present an affirmative case by calling witnesses or introducing evidence. This decision often depends on whether the defense believes the prosecution’s case is insufficient and aims to avoid inadvertently strengthening it by filling any gaps. However, the defense may choose to actively challenge the prosecution by presenting its own evidence, calling witnesses, or having the defendant testify, though the defendant is not obligated to take the stand. After the defense rests, both sides make their closing arguments. At the federal level, the prosecution goes first, followed by the defense attorney, and then the prosecutor gets a quick rebuttal at the end. In state courts, the defense attorney gives the closing argument first, with the prosecutor going last.

At the end of the closing arguments, the judge provides the jury with legal instructions. The jury then enters a private session called deliberations, which can last anywhere from a few hours to several days. If the jury reaches a verdict, it must be unanimous and is declared either “Guilty” or “Not Guilty.” If the jurors fail to reach a unanimous decision, the judge is required to declare a mistrial. After a mistrial, the prosecution must decide whether to retry the case.

For more information on plea offers in criminal cases in New York, schedule a consultation with an experienced Suffolk County criminal defense lawyer. Contact the Law Offices of Jason Bassett, P.C. at (631) 259-6060 today to get the information and legal answers you need.

Factors to Consider Details
Evidence presented at trial Evaluate the strength of the prosecution’s evidence and whether it proves guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
Likelihood of conviction Assess the probability of being found guilty if the case goes to trial based on available evidence and legal factors.
Client’s criminal record Consider the client’s prior criminal convictions and how they may impact sentencing if they choose to testify at trial.
Degree of risk a person can accept Determine the client’s comfort level with the potential outcomes, including the risk of a stiffer sentence if found guilty at trial.

Free Consultation

If you didnt find an answer

Free consultation, 24 hours a day, 7 days a week